2025 AAUP In the News

“That is textbook viewpoint-based discrimination,” the judge wrote of the Trump administration's order, which the AAUP and partners sued to stop. “The government’s threat of enforcement is not just targeted towards enforcement of federal law. Rather, the provision expressly targets, and threatens, the expression of views supportive of equity, diversity and inclusion.”

“The version of university life depicted in the letter is a gross distortion intended to undermine the public’s faith and confidence in colleges and universities,” AAUP President Todd Wolfson said. “In fact, education is not toxic indoctrination that smuggles illicit topics into the classroom. It is a process of inviting students to reflect on what we think we know.”

Even though there is no clarity on the new policies yet, some projects already have been put on hold amid uncertainty over the future of research touching on issues related to diversity, said Todd Wolfson, president of the AAUP.

Some of the studies already being halted include research on artificial intelligence and how racism can be coded into systems, he said. Other projects Wolfson has heard about getting stopped include research on health equity and studies on the urban literacy rate as it relates to class in places with large concentrations of Black people.

For all its many flaws, the U.S. system of higher education has become well-known across the world for its reputation of research and teaching without government interference. The cornerstone of such a system is “academic freedom.”  And this is what SB 1 would destroy.

“We need our colleges and universities to stand up and fight for their long-held commitments and not fold like deck chairs,” AAUP president, Todd Wolfson, said. If colleges don’t do that now, they “may not be around in four years.”

 “The elimination of DEI programs and initiatives at public academic institutions are a threat to the democratic purposes of higher education as a public good. The AAUP is proud to stand up and defend our campuses and communities from this vague and destructive executive order.”

A coalition of professors, diversity officers and restaurant worker advocates filed a federal lawsuit Monday in a bid to block President Donald Trump’s executive orders that target diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in the U.S. government, the private sector and academia, alleging that he exceeded his authority in issuing them.

Sanders’ proposal to fire professors over “indoctrination” drew criticism from civil liberties and faculty groups. Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors, called it a “grossly hypocritical false narrative.”

“Sanders is doing a disservice to Arkansas students by suggesting she will deny due process for faculty with ideas she disagrees with,” Wolfson said. “Maligning a system that is an engine of innovation and bedrock of our democracy hurts Arkansas students.”

The American Association of University Professors gets it. In a recent statement, the AAUP explained why DEI statements need not conflict with, and often fortify, academic freedom. Albeit less of a focus, the AAUP also surfaced why anti-DEI laws—including DEI statement bans—exact a double toll on academic freedom.

With power dangerously centralized, the defense of our institutions now hinges on the moral strength of a few wealthy individuals.

That’s a thin shield. Restoring a balance of power on American campuses would be more effective. As our Founders understood, power diffused in a system of checks and balances helps guarantee democracy. Centralized power, on the other hand, is always susceptible to abuse.