In November, the AAUP joined with the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence in an amicus brief challenging a Texas statute and a University of Texas at Austin policy mandating that faculty allow concealed handguns in their classrooms. The brief argues that the policy violates faculty members’ academic freedom.
Texas passed a “campus carry” law in 2015, and UT Austin issued its policy the following year. Several faculty members sued, challenging the policy and the law. The lower court dismissed the case, holding that the faculty had not proven that they had been harmed by the law or university policy. The faculty appealed, and the case is now before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The brief filed by the AAUP argues that the presence of weapons has a chilling effect on the academic exchange of ideas. The “decision whether to permit or exclude handguns in a given classroom is, at bottom, a decision about educational policy and pedagogical strategy,” the brief states. “It predictably affects not only the choice of course materials, but how a particular professor can and should interact with her students—how far she should press a student or a class to wrestle with unsettling ideas, how trenchantly and forthrightly she can evaluate student work. Permitting handguns in the classroom also affects the extent to which faculty can or should prompt students to challenge each other. The law and policy thus implicate concerns at the very core of academic freedom: They compel faculty to alter their pedagogical choices, deprive them of the decision to exclude guns from their classrooms, and censor their protected speech.”